![]() The way to do it is through exif tool which works with “file” metadata (back to the first statement). I would add that there is no function in Digikam (as far as I know) to copy “image” metadata to another (grouped) image. This decoupling is not impossible with Digikam, but today it is limited, first by the settings designed for “file” metadata, then by the need to go through template editing while some metadata are image per image specific, and last by the unclear correspondance between “image” metadata (location for example) and “file” metadata (xmp specific location field for example). For archiving we can archive the database which seems to me better than to rely on xmp files or, worse, than modifying orignal jpg file. View and edit properties of your photos online with this web app powered by GroupDocs.Metadata. Then, in a second step, we may want (or not) to push (some) metadata to some files for publishing. After performing the above steps, your location will be deleted from the photo metadata. Therefore the database is the right place to store them. ![]() I think that metadata are first data associated to an image. Download a free trial from the Mac App Store. file name, date taken, keywords, description, location, photographer’s details, copyright info, etc. My understanding is that Digikam has been designed with “metadata” = “data in the files”. SnipTag is an app for batch-cropping scanned photos, but it also has a powerful metadata editor to add or edit up to 25 types of IPTC metadata tags, e.g. You need to either enable writing to raw files …
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |